PRI readies energy reforms as Pemex output plummets
“I continue to prepare the presentation of the energy reform that will stimulate national development. I’ve decided to announce it next week,” Peña Nieto wrote on Twitter.
The delay comes as political parties extend negotiations over the reforms, which will include the controversial proposal for constitutional amendments that allow foreign corporations to partner with the government-run monopoly Petroleos Mexicanos (Pemex) in oil and gas exploration and production, thus ending 75 years of near-absolute state control over the industry.
News of the proposal came just as the head of Pemex’s refinery branch had announced plans to invest in a refinery in the United States. Citing the profitable Deer Park refinery in Houston that Pemex acquired in a partnership with Shell in 1992, Miguel Tame, the director of Pemex Refinacion, said this week that investing in another refinery north of the border would bring “good results.”
The Deer Park refinery brought in 1.3 billion pesos last year, according to a report sent to the Security and Exchange Commission. In contrast, Pemex Refinacion lost over 142 billion pesos in Mexico in 2012, plus another 79 billion pesos up until June 30 this year.
Another refinery in the United States could prove a more practical alternative to Pemex’s refinery in Tula, Hidalgo, which is 11 months behind schedule and is now due to cost 2.6 billion dollars more than the nine billion dollars originally envisaged.
Due to inadequate investment, Pemex lacks the capacity to refine much of the crude oil it produces. As such, Mexico loses millions every year by exporting crude oil to the United States and then importing nearly half of its gasoline at higher prices.
Although it is one of the world’s ten biggest crude oil producers and provides around one third of the federal government’s annual budget, Pemex is notoriously inefficient and production slowed to an 18-year low last month. Crude oil production fell to 2.5 million barrels a day in July – the lowest monthly output since October 1995, when it produced 1.9 million barrels a day – and Pemex is now headed toward a ninth straight year of declined output since peaking at 3.5 million barrels a day in 2004.
This continued slump in production will be viewed in some quarters as further evidence that Pemex should be opened up to private investment in order to boost both efficiency and productivity.
Exxon, Chevron and Spanish oil producer Repsol SA are among companies that have expressed interest in Mexico’s oil fields. In return for their investment, these firms could receive cash payments, a percentage of the oil produced or a stake in an oil field’s underground reserves, under the government’s soon-to-be-unveiled proposal.
Although Peña Nieto plans to maintain Pemex under state control, the idea of granting concessions to foreign energy companies is viewed by certain sectors of society as tantamount to privatization. This makes the impending legislation not only one of the most significant developments in recent Mexican history, but also one of the most polemic.
Since its foundation in 1938, when socialist President Lazaro Cardenas expelled foreign oil companies and nationalized the industry, Pemex has been a source of great pride for the Mexican people. The embodiment of Mexico’s independence from foreign intervention, it has become something of a holy cow and any perceived attempt to privatize it will be met with fierce resistance from the Mexican left.
The leftist Party of the Democratic Revolution (PRD) has already made clear it will not support any constitutional changes proposed by the government, while other left-wing organizations have vowed to lead massive demonstrations in a bid to keep Pemex completely in the hands of the state.
However, the Institutional Revolutionary Party (PRI) does not need the support of the PRD in order to obtain the two-thirds majority required to pass the bill in Congress – provided it can keep the conservative National Action Party (PAN) on side. Ideologically, the PAN is much closer to the PRI than the PRD on this matter and last week it presented its own aggressive proposal for constitutional reform, which would permit concessions and strengthen Mexico’s energy regulatory bodies by making them autonomous.
Carlos Slim eyes up the oil industry
Ahead of the anticipated energy reforms, Mexican magnate Carlos Slim has been gradually investing in the sector over the last seven years.
Although upcoming telecommunications reforms will see Slim’s Telmex lose a certain share of the market, he seems determined to make up for any losses by moving into the oil industry. While he cannot invest directly in Pemex or produce crude oil in Mexico, Slim, the world’s richest man, has won several contracts to help Pemex drill for oil, while investing in several oil-producing companies elsewhere in Latin America.
Since December 2006, Swecomex, a subsidiary of Slim’s Carso Infrastructure and Construction (CICSA), has won a number of contracts from Pemex for the drilling and completion of oil wells in southern Mexico – projects worth over 400 million dollars. Swecomex remains a major supplier of Pemex to date, while CICSA recently signed a 415-million-dollar contract with Pemex in return for the use of its drilling platforms in the Gulf of Mexico.
In 2008, Slim acquired a 5.99 percent stake in U.S. firm Allis-Chalmers Energy, which specializes in oil, natural gas and well drilling and has contracts in several Latin American countries, including Mexico and Argentina. The same year, Slim bought 15.4 percent of Bronco Drilling, a contractor from Oklahoma which won two contracts to drill onshore wells in the Chicontepec basin in eastern Mexico.
The following year, Slim increased his share in Allis-Chalmers Energy to 9.2 percent, while CICSA bought 60 percent of Bronco Drilling’s Mexican operations for 30 million dollars. However, in 2011, Slim sold his stake in Bronco Drilling, making a significant profit as he had bought around 4.2 million shares at six dollars per share and then sold them at 11 dollars per share.
In February 2011, Slim bought 70 percent of the Tabasco Oil Company in Colombia for 23.3 million dollars, while in June 2012 he bought 8.4 percent of Argentina’s YPF oil firm. If the Mexican government succeeds in allowing private companies to invest in Pemex, it seems likely that Slim will be among the first in line.
Diego Luna interview on Huff Post Live
I’ve been blogging for the Huffington Post UK for about two years now and on Tuesday I had the honour of being invited to appear on Huff Post Live to ask Mexican actor Diego Luna a couple of questions.
As the name implies, Huff Post Live is a live TV-network-style online stream run by the Huffington Post. Diego Luna is – along with his best mate Gael Garcia Bernal – the best known Mexican actor of his generation and a bona fide Hollywood star.
Luna made his breakthrough alongside Garcia in the brilliant Mexican road movie Y Tu Mama Tambien in 2001 and the pair both appeared in professional football (soccer) satire Rudo Y Cursi in 2008. He also starred in the Oscar-winning Milk and last year’s Will Ferrell comedy Casa de Mi Padre.
Luna was appearing on Huff Post Live to promote his latest film, the sci-fi drama Elysium, which also stars Matt Damon and Jody Foster and was directed by Neill Blomkamp, the man behind 2009’s fantastic alien apartheid movie District 9.
The interview was conducted in the Huff Post Live studio with myself and one other guest appearing through a Google+ hangout.
Of course, this being my first time live on air, I had an absolute nightmare. First, as we were setting up, the video on my webcam refused to work; then the audio went dead and I had to restart my computer as the minutes ticked painfully away…
We finally got it all working during the opening minutes of the show, but then, just as I was being introduced and reading out my first question – i.e. the most inopportune moment possible – the phone in my house started ringing right behind me and could clearly be heard in the studio. Very professional eh?
I’d prepared a few questions – some more closely related to Elysium – but Luna ended up covering those earlier in the interview, so I decided to opt for a couple of more political questions.
You can watch the entire interview here, but here’s the transcript of my questions and Luna’s thoughtful responses:
Me: Greetings from Mexico, Diego. You were talking earlier about the 1 and the 99 percent and I believe parts of your new movie Elysium were shot in contrasting poor and rich areas of Mexico City. So my question is: do you consider wealth inequality to be one of the biggest problems facing Mexico today?
DL: Definitely, but in the world – not just in Mexico. I think it’s a contradiction; we live in a country that gives so little chances to so many, but at the same time we have the richest man on the planet (Carlos Slim), so there is definitely a contradiction there. They ask me, ‘How long until we have Elysiums around the world?’ and I’m like ‘We already have them.’ In Mexico we have a place called Santa Fe which is a little place where we build these amazing buildings, there’s so much money there and the view from every window is of poverty. Just in front of it there’s people living with nothing, one on top of the other, and that’s ridiculous.
The whole idea behind the film is that one day those people are going to have to build a Santa Fe in the sky because otherwise someone is going to get to their apartments and want to sleep in the same bed. It makes no sense. So definitely it’s one of the biggest issues and that brings others like impunity and corruption. It’s definitely an issue that we have – not just in Mexico – but in Latin America and that’s a little bit what the film is about.
Me: Do you feel that Mexico has taken a step backwards by voting the Institutional Revolutionary Party back into power just 12 years after ending seven decades of one-party-rule?
DL: Okay Duncan, I think Mexico is a different place today, so we can’t think like that. What is the PRI today? What is the PAN? What is the PRD? It’s complicated; it’s not that we’re going back exactly to where we were. The country experienced something new in the last 15 years.
I think I’m part of a generation that suddenly realized that change could come and that we should all participate. I have the feeling that we’re kind of like a teenager country – we’re still finding out who we are – but at least we’re not a kid anymore and that brings me hope. I’m not saying if it’s good or bad where we are today; but it’s not the same (as it was). It can’t be.
I’m different; this interview is very different! I’m in Los Angeles trying to promote Elypsium and you’re asking me about the city I just left yesterday in an airplane. That couldn’t happen 20 years ago so I believe we live in a different time and it’s in our hands. So that feeling of power to bring change is something I didn’t have 20 years ago.
Homicide investigators shot dead in Guadalajara
Two agents of the Jalisco Prosecutor General’s Office (FGE) were shot dead in Guadalajara’s Monumental neighborhood on Friday morning.
Roberto Samuel Perez Gutierrez, 43, and Jaime Alberto Morales Bueno, 41, were driving to work when they came under fire from several assailants aboard a Jeep Liberty and a Stratus style car at the crossing of Belisario Dominguez and Circunvalacion at around 7 a.m. Forensic experts recovered at least 30 shell casings from rifles and handguns at the scene of the crime.
Perez, who joined the police in 1997, and Morales, who signed up in 2008, had been working in the FGE’s homicide division.

